Tees split on power provision
TEESSIDE stands divided over the benefits of a new nuclear power station in the region, according to an nebusiness poll.
More than half (53%) believe the North-east needs a new station and advocates say it would create a wealth of opportunities for Teesside’s engineering supply chain.
But others say the main focus should be on promoting simple energy-saving initiatives, with nuclear power only one element of a broader alternative energy strategy.
Robin Davison, chairman of the marketing group of the Tees Valley Engineering Partnership and managing director of Stockton-based recruitment firm Wolviston Group, is a firm advocate of the next generation of nuclear power stations and says it is essential the region begins preparations now.
He said: “Where would we be if the lights go out? Wind and solar energy alone are not enough. To support the country’s energy needs, we would have to continue building wind farms all over the UK.”
He believes a new nuclear station to replace British Energy’s plant at Hartlepool would have “good spin-offs” for his and other local companies.
But others remain unconvinced nuclear power will provide a fit-for-purpose solution to the country’s energy needs.
Adrian Hughes, environmental, health and safety manager at 3M Aycliffe - which manufactures respirators and environmental protection products - believes the energy debate should not be boiled down to a decision on a new nuclear power station.
He said a cohesive strategy “at government and regional levels” was required to educate people on the benefits of energy saving initiatives.
